He justifies this by saying that the philosopher's stone is nothing but life-force (Ch
The Philosopher’s Stone is (supposedly) real?! Book of Aquarius
He justifies this by saying that the philosopher's stone is nothing but life-force (Ch
The Philosopher’s Stone is (supposedly) real?! Book of Aquarius
He justifies this by saying that the philosopher's stone is nothing but life-force (Ch
Scientists studying the 6th sense.
There's been some recent discussions on OC about serious, not pseudo, scientists and the study of the occult. I found this video, which some of you might find very important and interesting.
How do you personally conceive of the ultimate reality?
1. How do you personally conceive of the ultimate reality?
2. What is our true nature?
3. What is the true nature of the universe?
4. What is the primary aim of human life?
Feel free to respond to one or all of these questions as you wish. The more input we get, the richer our discussion will be.
Clash of the Titans?
In another thread I wrote:
Yes, you've made the negative stereotypes you believe in and your bigotry perfectly clear by now.
It isn't bigotry but plain fact that science, on the whole and in every respectable corner, dismisses magic as nonsense.
Clearly you don't appreciate the irony in that pronouncement, but it stands as a shining testament to a well-known pattern that people tend to be somewhat incapable of recognizing their own bigotry as bigotry. Here's the salient thing in this specific example: bigotry tends to be supported and perpetuated by over-generalizing, overly simplistic and often noticeably muddled thinking. While you clearly feel your statement there is well-founded and factual, you actually say so, there is clear evidence of muddled thinking in your word choice. In your defense, it's a rampant usage in the common vernacular of our culture, so if you're feeling singled out, please don't. I'm trying to alert the general readership to a general problem. You've made yourself a convenient poster boy, but I honestly don't care about your personal attitude; I'm more interested in the community at large and the effects of the misinformation you're disseminating. In other words, I'm not out to change your mind for your sake, I just want to expose the errors in what you're saying.
When you say, science, on the whole and in every respectable corner, dismisses magic as nonsense, what you really mean to express is what scientists do or think this or that. Science, as I'm sure you are well aware, is an endeavor, and as such lacks the individual will necessary to dismiss anything, on the whole. That power is limited to sentient individuals. I know what you meant though, and I know you did to, but the word choice reveals an underlying cognitive bias, wherein scientists are perceived as a homogeneous blob with a unified will and attitude, rather than the collection of highly diverse individuals that actually makes up the group.
Prejudice, regardless of the groupings involved, whether membership is inborn or self-selected, tends to follow certain patterns like that. The outgroup is pretty much always seen as much more homogeneous than the ingroup; it's a perceptual anomaly that has been theorized about quite a bit in social cognition literature. Try your phrase again, but reverse the positions of the words, science and magic, for a clear demonstration:
Magic, on the whole and in every respectable corner, dismisses science as nonsense. Notice that your original phrase correctly casts magic as a practice but incorrectly casts science as a thing, but it's easier to notice how unnatural it seems to cast magic as a thing in the same exact way.
The rare exceptions, as mentioned, are anthropologists and psychologists, who will almost always dismiss the subject as intriguing but misguided efforts. if you wish to dispute this, I'd love to see any professional scientist sign or type his name below this oath:
Even in trying to acknowledge the diversity that you must know exists on some level, you continue to stereotype subgroups within the meta-group, and you perceive the subgroups as perhaps only slightly better than the meta-group. In fact, you're assuming a common attitude that you imagine summarizes the thoughts and feelings of hundreds of thousands if not millions of human beings, what's more, human beings from fully every cultural and ethnic background in the world.
While I think it's true that there are individuals in the world today who would think you are a complete wanker, if not a delusional fool for the things you post to this website, and it's likely that some, though not all of them, are scientists. Whether or not a higher percentage of scientists than the general population thinks that way is an open question, but I think there's a good possibility of that being the case, but I also think it's not for the reasons you assume. That's where the paradigmatic issues will pick up, after considering your oath idea.
"I, the undersigned, do sincerely profess to believe in the existence of genuine magical powers."
You are a PhD. eh? I don't know whether you are involved in teaching, or what you do, but to show just how accepting the sciences are toward magic, consider printing and signing that oath above and sending it to those who provide your funding, supervise your research, or anyone else who is important to your work. Maybe let us know how that goes.[/QUOTE]
I hope readers noticed the stereotyping verbiage in the above passage this time (again imagine it read, how accepting the magics are toward science).
Just FYI, I'm not teaching this academic year, but I do teach psychology, neuroscience, and genetics courses. Right now I'm doing full time academic research, which is largely federally funded by the way.
Now, were I to send such an oath out, if it caused me any problems at all, it wouldn't be for the content; it would be because it's simply such a strange thing to do. The likely response would be, who cares and why are you bothering me with this? All anyone in academia really cares about is what you've published, in which journals, where your name appears on the author list, and how much funding you've attracted in the past.
Incidentally, in addition to just being a bizarre act, it would also be dishonest if the oath implies your personal definition of magic. It's pretty clear that we're not on the same page.
To address the general issue you're trying to raise though, most of my colleagues who know me as more than just a name know at least something about my interests and history in occult studies. I have never hid it, never felt the need to, and as near as I can tell have not suffered for it at all. In my personal experience, scientists are people and they come in all sorts, from very closed-minded and rigid to very open minded and truly curious, even about things like tarot card reading and "spell" work, much as you might find in any workplace. Given your very skewed notion about scientists, I think you'd be truly surprised by the chit chat at happy hour.
So, moving beyond the stereotypes, there does seem to be some between-group antagonism, and that's what the thread is really about. Understanding it, I believe, might be facilitated by a good look at the paradigmatic level. I'll post more later because this post is long enough, but questions and comments are welcome in the meantime.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?14011-Clash-of-the-Titans&goto=newpost
So, did god(s) create us or did we create god(s)?
Recognizing Alpha State On The Fly
- - - - -
For the following questions, please answer in as much detail as you can. (No, I won't be grading your essays. . .I know that feelings are often difficult to describe in physical terms, but I would appreciate it if you would try.)
1. How do you know for certain when you have entered the alpha state?
2. Do you use, or have you ever used, an EEG device of any kind to verify that your brainwaves are actually resonating between 8 and 12 Hz?
3. While in the alpha state, what physical sensations do you feel inside your head?
4. While in the alpha state, what physical sensations do you feel within your body?
5. When exiting the alpha state, how do you know for certain that you have returned to your usual waking state of consciousness (Beta (12 - 26 Hz) or Gamma state (26 - 80 Hz))?
- - - - -
Meditations on Infinity.
There is an infinity, which is beyond limitation, words, concepts, and form.
There is a created Cosmos, which is near infinite, very large, and is the relative grey or colors between the absolute poles of light and dark, life and death, infinite and zero.
There is a void, nothingness, which never existed and can never exist, as it self negates itself. Thus the void unlike Infinity is only a concept, which exists as the lowest vibration of the Cosmos, a almost nothingness state, but never true nothing.
I have spent many years working with spiritual and magical energy and meditating and contemplating Infinity.
A few days ago, I realized something. Stasis is zero or one, as it is just one thing, or rather nonthing, and so absolutely doesn't exist, just relatively, as lower actual movement, which we call dead or static. This part I already was convinced of long ago.
Here is what's new. Sense even the lowest and furthest away from pure movement, Infinity, is still movement. The thing we call nothing, or no, or zero, must be a part of what movement is. I said before stasis is zero or one, movement is atleast 2. One part where the energy is in change, movement, and one part where the energy is being, or at rest, existant. Neither of these can be seperated from each other, so 2 is a metaphore, not an actuality. Anyway, this is the nature of energy when it is moving at as fast as possible and so infinite, and well as slowest and all that's inbetween.
I figured this out, because from the eyes of something which has no beginning or end, if you entered it, would the created Cosmos be dead and frozen, expired in it's limitations, or alive and beginning or somewhere inbetween. It would be a paradox, as all these states would be viewable at once.
So this got me thinking. Maybe the created Cosmos is a part of Infinity, not seperate from it? If so Infinity would truly be THE ALL, as it literally is, and the Cosmos would be seen as just the middle of Infinity, having movement which arcs from lesser to greater, but never diminishes.
This is really hard to see, but I encourage you all to meditate on it. I don't claim anything which has form is immortal, as the only constant of energy is to move and so change, but we are living and have always lived, no matter what, in Infinity.
Once you realize this, you must then accept how you are going to life your life, and even how you are going to eventually totally die, except in essence, the essence of an immortal flame, which is to move.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13941-Meditations-on-Infinity.&goto=newpost
The Cosmos is a Sphere, and so is the Unmanifest. Theories of Unity.
Now, imagine a large bold circle inside the original one. This is also a sphere, which is the Light element, Fire.
The next is a lesser bold circle, inside the previous one. Again a sphere, this is the Greater Light, Lesser Dark middle, Air.
And so on, till Water, the dark point, which is a tiny sphere.
I've seen many shapes of what the Cosmos must look like, but I believe this is the actual one.
Now what happens when you discard the layers (elements), and see that what I just described is just a solid sphere? Is this to be in Infinity? To see all, past, present, and future, as one? Does this remove you from the cosmos? No, the cosmos is a part of Infinity. All it does it makes your every moment, from when you first realized this till the day you are fully gone, and only live as Spirit, what I call "One with the Tao." You should notice full synchronicity with all things. It's like everything is everything elses will and all moves as one giant will.
How the 4 Elemental Science is still true today.
Now let me show you how a traditional ceremonialist treats the 4 elements in regards to a near infinite amont of things.
Fire, Air, Fire. This is an example of something beyond the 4 elements. Let's call it electricity. Water, Earth, Water, Air, Fire, Water, Earth, Water. Here is a more complex thing. Let's call it, yellow and red mud.
These are just examples, but this shows how all things are indeed made of the 4 elements.
Questions, comments?
The Elemental Transcendental Gates – What Scrying and Objectivity has taught me.
This maps every direction, from what is upward (or inward), to what is downward (or outward), and what is between.
Thus it is the simplist and most accurate map of the manifest Cosmos.
Now Up = Fire, Upward down = Air, Downward up = Earth, and Down = Water.
At first glance the Cosmos appears to have emerged from Fire, as it is Upward, and descended downward, only to rise back up and reunite, with the Unmanifest beyond.
Why not just end, when it descends most downward? Because the force has nowhere to go. No true, Nothingness, as it's self negatory, to become stopped and static by. Plus the Unmanifest is Infinite, and has no beginning or end, thus the first emergence contains both downward and upward currents within it, the Alpha-Omega, beginning and end.
This is only partially accurate though. The first element, Fire, could say to be at it's largest (in the beginning or end), at 94% of mass of the Cosmos. Not 99%, as there are two middles which exist if 1% darkness exists, and not 100% as this is the mass of the Unmanifest itself.
Therefore, 4 elements emerged all at once from the Unmanifest. 94% mass, Fire, 3%, Air, 2%, Earth, and 1% Water. This is the size of both the elements in the beginning of the Cosmos. Since no two things can be completely identicle, or there isn't two or more things, just one. The size of the elements in the end of the Cosmos, is 93% Fire, 4% Air, 3% Earth, and 2% Water. This shows the end has more darkness than light, showing the pull from the Unmanifest gradually outweighing the push. The Unmanifest has no size as it is beyond size, but is more expansive in quality, than contractive. Thus why the push lasts so long, and the Cosmos exists an near infinite amount of time, before reuniting with the Unmanifest and existing forever as Infinite mass, existing simutaneously before, during, and after the created Cosmos. The created Cosmos, is like frozen in time mass, existing alongside the infinitely moving Unmanifest.
The Unmanifest is moving so quickly it is like looking at a wheel spinning super fast, it appears stationary. There is a secret to this, about movement and stasis, light and dark, and how the Unmanifest contains the seeds which created both, being Transcendent and so beyond all limited phenomena.
Anyway, all the elements together like pieces of a puzzle, form the Unmanifest. Them broken apart and so elements, is the Cosmos. They all fluctuate in size, as the Cosmos moves through it's ages, and dark becomes quite big, in comparison to it's small size, but still remains the smallest and the weakest. Never the less the Unmanifest is in every moment pushing and pulling upon itself to create the Cosmos, in every moment, and things return to the Unmanifest, and are created from it, every moment in time, as long as the Cosmos exists.
Some beings might be interested in reuniting in body, mind, soul, and or spirit, with the Unmanifest for power or for liberation.
Sense there are 4 elemental pieces of the pie, there are 4 elemental gates or openings to the Unmanifest. I share these so that fellow mages can explore the gates themselves, and open them into their being, for further eventual total liberation from the Cosmos, or for more magical power. As all movement, every moment, stems from the Source. Magick is the deliberate movement of things by conscious beings. As movement is change, the essence of magick.
My simple diagram of the Cosmos

All around, is Infinity, as it is boundless and infinite. The Cosmos is like a bubble existing within it's boundless mass.
The first plane is the plane of Fire element, symbolised by the upward triangle. Here the energy of fire exists first with the first created being, the Godhead first, and the immortals and gods existing like a pyramid, more and more one and unified all the way up. Where as Infinity is one, this is oneness, a light oneness, where many things exist together as one body.
The second plane is the plane of Air element, symbolised by the upward triangle with a line through it. The line denotes it's a mixed sign of light and darkness, with light the greater. Here the heavens exist, the mythical clouds and stars of the upperworld of the earth religions and cultures. If alien planets exist with sentient lifeforms, their mythical heavens exist here too.
The third plane is the plane of Earth element, symbolised by the downward triangle with a line through it. Again a mixed sign, this time with darkness the greater. This is the material universe. There may be many material universes which all exist under the Earth element sphere, as theorised about in Quantom Science. All are planes of body and form though, with worlds of many different lifeforms.
The fourth plane is the plane of Water, symbolised by the downward triangle. This is the Underworld and the Void or Nothingness, and the place where the Hells and demons exist in the various mythologies of the world. This is also the place of the unreligious or materialistic dead. They exist as ghosts (higher) or shades (lower), and roam interfering with the material plane above (haunting), or sleeping in the low energy areas, or even trapped in the torturous Hells recieving punishment for their wicked ways. Sometimes higher forces trap them here, but most are here out of self punishment and an undeserving attitude of being in the higher planes. Some enjoy in a sick way hell, and some fewer even seek to rule the Hells and live as demon kings. Relishing in destruction and the many ways of self and other, torture and mutalation. Hell is mostly a Christian/Jewish/Muslim/Buddhist place though, and those who were not faithful and fell still believing or raised strongly this way and unable to shake it, are the usual inhabitants. Yes, of all the places of the Cosmos, hell is the most self concieved of places.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13883-My-simple-diagram-of-the-Cosmos&goto=newpost
Valuation of Your Car and Driver
This is really no different than outside occultism. Jon Doe thinks he is a success because he has a good job, supports his family and lives a comfortable happy life. Joel Doe thinks Jon’s a sucker who will never experience “true” success because he doesn’t own a jet and have four million dollars in the bank. Success is an individual thing, something based on an individual valuation system and that system is different for each person.
If you value insight and you get it, you are successful. If you value material objects and get it, you are successful. The one thing I really do not understand and it is painful to watch are the ones who value one thing, get another and cannot look past it to get anything out of it.
Perhaps it is this general perspective of life that influences us more than anyone realizes, or wants to. Simple things are generally discarded as not useful.
An example of this is a magician that is working an operation with, let’s say, the object being to gain a new home. Instead, he has a dream about getting a new job and in his dismay that his conjuration for a home was not successful, he looks at the job offer that is actually presented to him in real life, after his dream, in disdain and doesn’t take it. And then the job he does have is lost as the business goes down and now he can’t even afford the home he is already in. And woe unto him that does not understand the position he is in, or cannot see past his nose.
For me personally, I tend to value things and ideas by what I get out of them. I really don’t care where they are from, what book, what epiphany, what mundane or magical guise they show up in. I don’t even care if the are real or not, what I do care about is their value to me.
I’ve had a lot of things go on in my life good, bad, ugly, awesome, divine and I value each of them for what I have gotten out of them. The interesting thing for me is, I seem to get more out of things than many people and I wonder if it’s just me or due to the magical works I have put in or a combination thereof. I tend to think it’s a combination.
We each have a personality and nature of some sort, our Will. The big double u. And my Will be done, so may it ever be. I’ve been at this stuff a while and it never ceases to grip me that there is so much more to discover, learn, be inspired by…and value. You hear words and phrases and look up meanings and meditate…sometimes you get off track by some idea or another and adventure off to explore some more fancy regions of what we call occultism, metaphysics or spirituality…and then suddenly the key is turned…and !OH! THAT’S what THAT means! But you knew what it meant all along…although you did not value it because you didn’t know how to apply it, how to value it…didn’t know exactly what you should be getting out of it until suddenly. Holey rusted metal, Batman!
People generally do not value what they find of no significance. I don’t value one system of magic over another because I find equal value in all of them, their significance in my life fluctuates over what I value most, which is generally being and enjoying my life. I figure this is the life I have here, this one…if there is another one coming I’ll deal with that if/when reincarnation is an issue but right now I don’t see any reason to value and enjoy what I have and move towards more of that in the future.
I've had some discussions about disease, health and infirmities (whether or not any unhealthy/diseased/disabled magician should be practicing). I won’t get into who should be doing what and when, as I think magic is an area beneficial to all people no matter what may be imperfect about them. Although beneficial and of value are two different things. Something could be beneficial but if the individual finds no value in it it basically renders it all moot simply because someone is not going to get out of something what they could or might if they refuse to be open to its value.
Magic is like fixing a car. It pays to understand the workings of everything under the hood to be able to repair it. Although it doesn’t matter if you know all that to drive it. One can simply “drive” magic all around and it would be good, although if something happened to the engine you wouldn’t know how to fix it. When fixing a car engine or troubleshooting some malfunction, it pays to study and understand how it all works together on some level, even if you don’t completely understand how each piece works. I can replace an alternator without knowing exactly what is going on inside it, but it helps to know what an alternator does when the car won’t start to be able to know if it’s the problem or not.
So you (magician) are driving around your spiritual self (car) and you are in bliss going down the interstate (life experience). You hit a bump in the road (different worldview) and your car shakes and shimmies and sputters and dies. You pull over and scratch your head…but…this doesn’t make sense, you say, I was driving right, I did everything correctly, I should be successful, I should have results dammit! But yet there the magician is with his car on the side of the road with the hazards on.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13842-Valuation-of-Your-Car-and-Driver&goto=newpost
Taking a near infinite walk.
You are only a homo sapiens restricted to the land continents of planet earth, if you believe in newtonian science, which was proven wrong long ago by quantom science.
So next time you go out, take an near infinite walk and journey around not to expected earth habitats, but to anything the imagination can concieve.
I've been doing this lately, and although my psychic filter tries to get me to notice what's only familiar and keep me rooted in time and space to my own neighborhoods in my own town, I'm starting to notice really strange things. Thing is when I go to investigate them, it was shown to just be a trick of the eyes or shadows, or other illusions.
But I'm persistant, I won't stop till I start seeing some faeries, ancient gods, dinosaurs, dragons, elfs, monsters, and various alien species, walking among us, and find myself in enchanted forests, mystical lakes, and futuristic sections of town, and other wonders.
I know they are all there, existing side by side with consensual reality, in a gigantic near infinite (meaning biggest as possible), cosmos, in which we all inhabit.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13832-Taking-a-near-infinite-walk.&goto=newpost
The psyche of the magician.
The reason why is because magick is taught to come from the will, an aspect of the self consciousness, (it's other twin, to percieve), as the will is a spark of the cosmic unmanifest in each and every conscious thing. Which to the magician who is atleast somewhat an animist, as all is energy and moving and so alive, is everything, even a subatomic particle, or a pebble of sand.
So everything has an essence, which is all the same essence at the core, the cosmic unmanifest Tao.
Seeing the core of one's self this way, means the physical and objective outer dimension of the cosmos, comes last not first. The cosmos is first and largely made of mind stuff. So the magician differs from the psychologist in seeing mind and consciousness as being the inner levels of the entire cosmos, not just rooted in the individual's brain. The fracturing begins from the unmanifest into various layers of mind stuff, all seperating into each individuals personal soul. This is not forgien to psychology though, as even Carl Jung could see there was a collective unconscious that we all shared behind our personal psyches. But Jung's psychology has been seen as mystical and not shared by the main stream, which sees the world much more objectively and physically. There is still Jungian psychologists and schools which evolved from this today though, so although not accepted as main stream, such interconnected inner psychology is still around and in practice by more than just the mystical and magicians.
Anyway, the mind stuff the cosmos is mostly made of is divided into different layers in different magical paradigms. The most popular though goes as follows;
1. Unmanifest collective (un)consciousness
2. The plane of spiritual bodies, or true selves (souls)
3. The logos, or divine mind, and the mental sphere
4. The astral, or emotional plane, the plane of visualization and imagination, where form first properly takes shape
5. The etheric plane, or plane of ghosts and ghost matter, where mental/emotional form manifests through and to as, the physical plane
6. The material plane, where atoms and physical energy (waves), make up bodies of individuals and things, the senses
(There is a 7th plane, hinted in by the shamanic underworld, the pagan underworld, the Buddhist and Judaic religions hells and qlipoth, which is the most outer plane, probably some of which is outer space in the physical it is the plane of entropy where energy slows and darkens so much things float around, much like the astral/etheric planes. Usually the plane of matter in most world cosmologies is not the last and final emanation, though the last where light still exists in percentage and so a part of the "Divine order," or "plan." In other words where things go backwards, it's purposely left out of most magicial books, because it is essentially a "junk," plane and to disharmonious for use, plus man is physical and no one wants to encourage him/her to go backwards in spiritual evolution and power.)
So anyway, this mind stuff converts to the physical (and beyond) through a tranmission from inner (psychological, subtle) to outer (dense, objective), planes. Thus describes how we are all at the root one, but through varying layers of seperation come to be in a world of individuals and objects. Thus is the order of manifestation.
Now the magician's psyche is not just consciously anchored in the root source, where the mage realizes all power comes from, but is a finely built magical tower, streching through the planes.
The first aspect of the magician's psyche, is his/her personal God, or anthropmorphisation of the source. Common man is taught to worship a supreme deity, but the magus worships his/her own power. Power is raw in nature, even when the mana of magick is given purpose through magick pratice, it still is very subtle and raw in nature. Thus is the essence of the mover, of power. The magician sees where he/she is a purist or not, his/her own personal god as his/her own power, as this is what the magician relies upon, as he/she is taught one's self is God, and the esoteric or inner mysteries of the cosmos. Where as the religious man/woman sees very much only the outer mystery of the cosmos. When hoping for something, or wishing, or an elaborate ritual or practice to find one's true self, or holy guardian angel, the mage is praying to his/her personal god. Power anthropmorphised. All things are somewhat conscious, so treating this as such, is not as antropmorphised as one first might believe. Power protects, guides, and listens.
The next level of the magus's psyche is the multiself. A mage realizes that as possibilities manifest from the source downward, they are at first one, then many, then one again, in the pattern of seperation. One as an absolute first, then many because of seperation, then one because of supreme seperation which makes the self alone, cut off from his/her other halves. So the multiself is the middle self, between the solar little "i," and the supreme big "I." This "We," is the many aspects and archetypes and personalities which play out through out the day, allowing a person to experience interaction and many things, other than his/her ordinary solar self. Solar meaning prime, or ego identity. Much magic is to be had to the mage who sees and makes him/herself multiple, but harmonised, not a mental disorder of multiple complexes all roaring to take the center stage and shove the solar self away, again and again.
Lastly is the solar self. The solar self is called as such because in astrology the sun is the predominant energy which conditions the unborn baby's psyche, in this lifetime and somewhat in the next (in the etheric as a ghost, primarily, but some don't spend much time here after death, seeking the higher states instead as they are easily accessible from the etheric). This is one's predominate personality. It is what ordinary man thinks he/she is, and doesn't give much though to unity or seperation of things. It is this self which most are attached to in life, but in old age and after death while visiting the higher planes, is usually seen as a burden and a new self is chosen if unenlightened or the multiself is fully embrased as a comic "we," consciousness with others if so. Some supposedly reincarnate back into the physical with their new selves, though personally I have never seen this, but whether natural or because of religious beliefs of reincarnation, I have read many studies of children who remember past lives so astonishingly, it is a real phenomena atleast for some. Anyway if mediation and mysticism are not enough for the magician to break through his/her solar self, astral projection is a surefire way to experience many things I have mentioned without first dying, even if a somewhat paler experience unless the magician is a master at astral projection.
The magus as opposed to the mystic does not try to cast off all these selves (except the "highest," which properly understood lacks boundries and so isn't a self), or aspects of the psyche, but intergrates them as as a functioning hierarchy. With this great and much magick can be achieved.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13793-The-psyche-of-the-magician.&goto=newpost
My Personal Paradigm (with developmental trajectory)
Here's the question that prompted the following response:
But the more I read your posts, the more I wonder how much you actually KNOW of the occult. You say that you've been practicing magic for X years now. What exactly do you do? What results have you obtained so far? Have you tried other arcane arts apart from magic? If so, which ones? What were your impressions?
I started out as a teenager (mid 1970s) experimenting with simple spells, candle and herb stuff mostly, some chanting and that silly doggerel that passes for "spells" on TV, spirit boards, pendulums, automatic writing, trance-ish, OOBE-ish ideas, etc. One thing led to another. In my 20's I worked with some local witches for a few years then bored of the politics, read a lot (a WAY lot), ventured into GD-style ceremonial magick and subsequently did daily developmental ritual work (including many years of "energy" work within that frame), experimented with some Eastern-inspired work as part of that too, and mostly did talismans for the practical stuff. That was the 80's, so the Neo-Spare stuff and general Chaos theme had my attention for good while too, sigils and servitors, the gnosis bit, etc.
There was substantial experimentation with various forms of sex magick during periods in the 80s and 90s, comatose-eroto lucidity for example; some S&M play (pain as a path to the gnostic state, which is called subspace in the S&M scene); something akin to the Sacred Rites discussed in Neoplatonic literature, ecstasy via utter abandon for lack of a better description; and some of what I guess amounts to westernized Tantric practices.
Through the 1990s (my 30s) my focus turned toward Medieval magick practices, astrological timing as a magical tool, and high ceremonial Goetic-style evocation, fed by a lot of study of Medieval, Neoplatonic, and Classical literature. By the end of that decade, however, my practice was evolving into a more general mode of what I guess can be termed spirit working with something akin to a shamanic or animistic attitude: the idea that all interactive things can be experienced as a spirit entity, or an intelligence that can be communicated and worked with in a way that effectively harmonizes common goals between myself and the intelligence (or spirit if you will). Stated more simply, it's the idea that anything and everything has a spirit that can be evoked for magical purposes, including:
The approach is more shamanic than goetic, in that the effort is less on control and more on finding the common ground between my goals and the entity's fundamental nature, and working toward mutually satisfying outcomes that serve us both. This is my primary magical technique today, and I'd say I've got a good 15 years of practice with it, more if you count the years in which the practice was taking shape.
- people living or dead, individuals or groups
- individual animals and plants as well as entire species of either
- fundamental dynamics, such as photosynthesis and the carbon dioxide-oxygen exchange, the need to consume animal and/or plant matter as sustenance, even magick in general, etc.
- general concepts like sacrifice, compassion, peace, etc.
- emotions, such as love, fear, anger, hate, disgust, jealousy, surprise, etc.
- social institutions of all types: courts, committees, families, schools, communities, governments, etc.
- and pretty much anything else you can think of
As for the results I've achieved over the years, one thing I've come to recognize is that it's very difficult to make one-to-one, working-to-outcome conclusions with any certainty. That's not to say that I don't have a history of trying; Heh. I absolutely do. But as I've matured and my practice has developed, my point of view has changed and with that came a recognition that some effects are probably illusory, and some effects while real and important are not necessarily what they seem to be at first flush.
Part of the problem there is that it's a rather all-consuming lifestyle for me. I do magick almost every day, for everything that matters to me, and have done so for maybe 25 years give or take several months-long periods off for various reasons. So which working had what effect really is a mess, not to mention that I don't just do magick either, I do everything I can think of to move my life where I want it to go. Again, what causes what is really just too complex to know for sure. Looking at the arc of my life and the overall effectiveness at achieving my aims epoch by epoch, which I can do thanks to a very disciplined journaling method I've been using for over 20 years, I can see trends that relate to the kinds of practices I engaged in, and I would assess my current methods to be the most efficacious for me overall.
Of course, it's possible that ones effectiveness naturally improves over the course of 30+ years of fairly consistent daily work, no matter how ones practice evolves or what it evolves into.
As for accomplishments that I think magick really helped with? My whole life qualifies but let's see, I'd say the big three are that I learned how to develop deep and meaningful relationships with people (my mate and children in particular), which to be honest I didn't think was possible up to 15 years ago, I earned a Ph.D. (just last year as a matter of fact), and have made at least one scientific discovery so far that stands a chance (small but a chance none the less) of making a real impact on humanity in time. I'm in a position to continue making discoveries that matter in the future too, and I continue to work magick toward that end, pretty every day.
There are two related but also distinct threads running through the years I've just summarized that have to be mentioned: what I guess can be called a generalized Pagan spirituality and also a persistent mystical drive. To explain briefly, mysticism, to me, amounts to a pursuit of Truth with a capital T, while Religion is mainly about inspiration, awe and wonder at the nature of, well, everything. Magick, however, is about taking action and getting things done. Religion, for me, guides my attitude about what is worth getting done, and the doing, the magick practice itself, provides many many opportunities to interact in informative ways with Truth with a capital T. So, they're distinct things really, but inter-related, and they all seem to be developing together, so in that sense it's all one thing.
So, if there are questions, particularly about how I practice magick today, how I think it works, what I think can be done with it, what I think the limitations are, etc., feel free to ask.
If your paradigm(s) were dellusional, would you still want to believe in them?
My decision is I would continue to believe in it, if it was aquired by theory and knowlege accompanied, by actual magical practice.
If it was just a paradigm formed out of theory or belief, I would abandon it.
Paradigm shifting, only has it's value when it continues magickal practice and knowlege. Treating everything as a belief and not experienced fact, has no value, as it breaks the rules of what we determine is real and not real, so we can align ourselves to the truth to gain better synchronicity and functionality with the cosmos.
What would you do?
Egyptian Mysteries
But it's not limited to OC of course. Even on the internet, the is very little information available about practical Egyptian occultism. No meditation exercises, nothing. I know that a lot of valuable information was lost with the burning of the Library of Alexandria, but stil... :(
The only book I found that gave practical instructions was The godess Sekhmet: Psycho-spiritual exercises of the Fifth Way. To illustrate how little I've been able to find on the subject, I wasn't sure if the guy had made everything up, from having a certain knowledge of the occult.
But I do admit that the exercises in that book are incredibly challenging, and if it's the real deal, then it seems like the Egyptians have one of the most advanced occult development systems available. I seriously advise anyone that's interested in progressing, magickaly speaking, to take a look at that book.
So does anyone have Egyptian practical exercises to share? Or book titles where I may find some? It really seems to me like the Egyptian path is one of those that are explored but very little, and hold tremendous promise.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13724-Egyptian-Mysteries&goto=newpost
Stopping/Preventing a Riot
This got me thinking, Should magick be used to stop/prevent a riot ? How could magick in any form be used to stop/prevent rioting? Has anybody used anti-riot magick before and how successful was it?
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13722-Stopping-Preventing-a-Riot&goto=newpost
[Article] Why the Cosmos reabsorbs into the Unlimited instead of ends in the Void
The first substance that was created was subtile light. It had the qualities of expansion and contraction, with expansion being the slight greater, as the Cosmos eventually repairs itself from all the contracting division and unifies everything into one expansive force. The greatest, is close to, but not the Infinite, but still it's great. So this expanded light is so vast it's near infinite.
Thus the light is more subjective, inner, and beyond mathematics, but still measurable in conscious vision, which is a property as well of light. Mathematics properly don't begin, until the first middle division of light contrasting into darkness, and even then they are still hazy. The second middle that of light now being overpowered by darkness allows for proper objectivity and so mathematics. This is where the physical universe(s) lie. Which is why science is such a power on the earth plane. But light still exists, and so we can calculate it, as the equasion of pi a neverending number.
The last plane, is where all light has contracted into various layers of darkness, untill reaching absolute zero, the void, nothingness, the opposite of Infinity, which is pure existence.
Now if the Cosmos over time has degraded from spiritual light, to metaphysical energy and substance, to matter and physical energy, to raw spacial entropy, why wouldn't it once reaching the void, stop, and be done with the Cosmos's existence?
The answer took me a while at thinking, but then I found it. Looking at the Cosmos as being something that exists throughout all time, past, present, and future, the light began as the biggest piece of the pie. The biggest can not be broken down into the smallest completely, but only in part, as it's the biggest.
Thus division and contraction can occur from the very beginning but only as a weaker force. The greater force is to expand into the Infinite. Now a greater force is not an ultimate force, so it still allows for some resistance. Thus why the Cosmos divided and created the astral and physical worlds as well as the underworld, or spacial dimensions.
Science has began studying dark matter and dark energy, and this I believe is the layers of substance that the dark aspect of the Cosmos is made of. After all the earth plane is half dark, half light, with dark slightly the greater. So darkness could be studied from it, without the need of a shaman to visit the underworld and tell you there are real layers of existence and a void which dwells in it.
So anyway, the darkness can be considered the end, if the light is the beginning, but sense when does energy flow in a strait line? Most energetic and even atomic phenomena on earth is spherical (the atom), or curves (like space and magnetism and gravity).
So taking a purely beginning to end approach of this flat look, is innacurate. The light is the beginning and the end, the alpha and omega, as it exists near Infinity which has no beginning or end.
Anyway, that's why we return (everything) to the source of existence, and nothing dies that is ends it's existence in the void. Well almost everything, when you look at time, the Cosmos, from beginning to end of it, is like a frozen phenomena in the vast Infinite phenomena. But this is a static look, and the Cosmos is never totally static, but always even near the void (which doesn't actually exist, just near as possible void, as nothingness is self existant negating, to be nothing is to not exist, ever, if it's pure nothing), moving. So a Spirit which is like a miniature database of all things, moves through the Cosmos's substance, from light to dark to light again, roughly, and this is what re-enters the Infinite. Thus why the earliest religion was animism and the last reigion is animism again but fully as scientificly and metaphysically as possible understood, instead of innate and prone to superstition.
To know this we must be in the latter phases of the Cosmos, and in anywhere from tomarrow to a few thousand years from now, we will all find ourselves as noncomporial beings entering one by one, with spirits of all kinds of creatures, plants, and things, into the vast Infinite. Into a state, which can not be described, only experienced, but is big enough for all things and more, to fuse as one, but not lose their existence, like a limb being reattached to a tree. The experience of being a limb into being an entire tree is the ultimate pay off, and ultimate ending to the entire Cosmos coming together as one. Pure existence, no more seperation, not even in the most little, all things lasting forever.
Comparing pagan god hierarchies with YHWH & his angels?
There is a supreme overlord or king in every pagan religion and then there are the more minor gods which are always his children (meaning he created them), who represent the various specialized powers of the cosmos.
Isn't this alot like the angels and God? The angels perform the specialized powers of the cosmos, and God represents the supreme All which embodies all of them at once.
Shouldn't monotheism, just be God, no angels? Why does something truly almighty need servants? Especially when this means they have their own consciousness and can rebel or reinterpret the commandments given?
I've looked the world over for a true monothiesm, and the best I've seen is Taoism. Although even in Taoism the local pagan gods were absorbed, the emperiors who ruled were diefied, and some extremely advanced Taoist masters became divine immortals.
Seems like everywhere you go, people respond to the power of the cosmos as being divided into many, instead of just one? Why is this? Because there are many people?
Pentagram – a ring of Thurisaz runes???
Now im wondering if I consider a pentagram to be ring of thursaz runes aswell as my usual pentagram would this increase its protective qualities. Also could this be one of the reasons why the pentagram is an affective protection symbol in the first place?
[Article] Self Mastery – Dissolution of the human ego.
There are many kinds of masters, masters of people, masters of animals, masters of martial arts, masters of magick, masters of swordsmithing, etc, but how many are there who are a master of themself?
Sure we all have consciousness, and so will and perception, and so with our "free will," the ability to act as we choose, we assume (in free societies), that we are our own master, and life is our choosing.
But are we by nature, because we are conscious, self masters? Many philosophers, magicians, and mystics would say no. Why? Because although we have choice and so self awareness, how aware are we really, and so how well can we really choose?
Meditation and contemplation, inner alchemy, psychology, self introspection, all these can make us more aware, more able to understand our choices and why we choose what we choose, and even how to choose differently and why should we.
But then we follow the path of exoteric to esoteric religion, philosophy, and the occult.
All these things can lead to greater awareness, but what is the Rome where all roads eventually lead?
Self mastery. Dissolution of the singular self into fields of consciousness. More and more untill the ego is completely dissolved like an egg floating in lava, and the individual is transcended.
Now it's true behind the individual self, lies the multiself, and one realizes we are not singular beings but a hive mind, each an aspect of the whole. This is wonderful, but only a middle step to something much greater.
An unbound, omnidirectional, field of consciousness. Life existing pure. Existence as I AM, without fracturing the I and the AM.
All this is the eventual goal, and one rises many times and falls just as many, and so glimpses of the omnious, are attained.
In the mean time though, one has a self and behind it a multiself. Mastery over these comes in many stages, but a fair enough mastery to call oneself a self master, is if one still believes in death, or merely transmutation, which are completely different. As one goes up and the other down.
Another test, over the then multiself, is that is one ever alone, or ever among the company of others? If one answers no to both, then one can say that one's wisdom of the self and multiself is sufficiant to mastery.
So how far along the road of self mastery are you? I have a ways to go, but so far see all things as arbitary and just tools including myself and others, even family, friends, and loved ones, to the unfoldment of the one consciousness, which creates all and reabsorbs all back into itself to create the dance of the cosmos, and gain something very important and precious, earned eternal life, not just innate, and so self created, self sustained. True self mastery.
The psychological illusion of the individual – The flawed condition of beings
The consciousness allows for will and perception and so the ability to make choices and be effected by choices.
The neuro/psyhological makeup allows for an internal identity, memory, character, and an inner contrast to the outer body.
The body allows for a fixed totality of self, the ability to move around, grow or shrink, and what directly interacts with the rest of existence, as it is the vehicle of the senses.
All these are purely flawed psychological boundries which have no real objectivity in existence though. They are the product of the cosmos delving from a point of total unity to more and more seperation, which results in higher or lower beings. Higher or lower meaning more innately connected to the source, or further away and deeper into seperation.
A being when young is like an eye, soaking up information, and doing more percieving than anything. The cosmos in many of it's areas, appears from the vantage point of consciousness and so an observer, as though it is made of many many things, all seperate and their own "thingness," or self, which interact and can be joined to bigger things or even be destroyed, that is reduced to smaller things, and so lose their selfhood.
This is the result of looking at an illusion with an undiscerning eye, and so accepting the false at face value. Critical thought with experimentation is not a natural way of cognation but a learned way. Innocence belongs in the beginning of time, and wisdom and experience at the end. It is just the way of things.
Never the less, there are no such things as beings, and there is only one consciousness.
If space seperates existence into many things, this is only a chosen perception, not an actual fact. Space could also be seen to connect all things as it "seperates," them. Space and substance, can only be opposed if viewed as such. There is no innate natural quality which seperates them as one which unifies and one which seperates. From the vantage point of either side, infinity or the abyss, one could see either or as what unifies or seperates, into an absolute and so unified, point.
Meditation on the Hara
Now the thing I'm wondering is "why?" Why is it so important to meditate on the Hara? This is the spot that martial artist generally meditate on, unless if they are involved in some form of internal martial arts. Not only that, but I was recently instructed to meditate on my Hara and Solar Plexus simultaneously for a month, to the exclusion of any other practice. The explanation I was given was that it would "kill emotions".
But with research, it seems that people have different reasons why Hara meditation is important. For instance, look at the explanation given in the book Ninja Mind Control by Ashida Kim:
All martial arts teach meditation on the Hara, but few know why. It is because, for proper movement, the waist must move first. One could learn any style or system and miss this important lesson.
Then Dr Jerry Alan Johnson, in Chinese Medical Qigong Therapy says this about the Hara:
THE LOWER FIELD OF ELIXIR
The Lower Dantian is the Dantian most familiar to martial artists and Zen meditators. It is regarded as the center of physical strength and the source of stamina. Called the "Hara" in Japanese, it is located in the lower abdomen, in the center of the triangle formed by drawing a line between the navel, Mingmen (lower back), and perineum. These three points form a pyramid facing downward. This configuration allows the Lower Dantian to gather the energy from the Earth. The Lower Dantian is the major storage area for the various types of Kidney energies. The Kidney energies are, in tum, closely linked with our prenatal energies and provide the foundation for all other types of Jing, Qi, Yin, and Yang energies in the body. The Lower Dantian is connected to the first level of Wei Qi (Protective Qi) circulating outside the body, extending from the body's tissues to about one inch. As the Lower Dantian fills with Qi, the Wei Qi field naturally becomes thicker.
When browsing the web, I even came upon this (from hara-awareness.ue):
The Hara Meditation in the last years has become a support in everyday life for thousands of people. Especially when stress is taking over the hara meditation helps to reconnect with inner qualities like calmness, strength and serenity.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13663-Meditation-on-the-Hara&goto=newpost
[Article] Are you sure you are always on the planet earth? – Planeswalking as a phenomena
I have for the past several years, been wondering if I indeed exist on a planet named earth in the physical universe, or if I drift between planes, especially while in meditation and the casting of magick.
This is not so far fetched. Many saints, masters, and gurus, and even shamans, have said to have visited the various heavens and hells while they were alive as physical men and women.
When I was younger I thought I was just projecting my consciousness, that is remote viewing or scrying as it was called in bygone ages, but in recent years the visions while in meditation and even in waking life (although more dim, and less senses engaged), have made me wonder how thin the veils between the worlds actually are.
Are we as physical as we think, and what is physical? Physical means to most to be bound to the laws of gravity, to move with legs, to grasp with arms, to have tissues which can be pierced by sharp objects and leak blood, but I wonder?
The planes are not so alien from one another as most seers like myself have observed them. Infact they are more dim or light, visually, and the "body," feels more free or constrained, depending upon how high or low one is among the planes, but there is land, sky, trees, buildings, etc, things very "physical," in all of them.
What do you think? Are you a physical man, like most of humanity believes, or a planeswalker, to borrow a great word from the card game, MtG?
Untranslated Grimoires
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13631-Untranslated-Grimoires&goto=newpost
Magic Circle Theory
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13597-Magic-Circle-Theory&goto=newpost
My vision for the world…
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13578-My-vision-for-the-world...&goto=newpost
LBRP as a spell
How it works:
Start off with LBRP to banish.
Now put Athame back into its sheath.
Then stand facing east, and have few moments of silence. Empty your mind.
The next step is then begin to visualize your desire. Once the visualization is clear in your mind, begin the LBRP again.
Perform the LBRP with the intent to banish any thoughts, emotions or any other impurities not relevant to intended desire, to banish any barriers you can think of that would prevent manifestation, and the intent of the LBRP as a spell being cast to bring desire into fruition, along with the traditional imagery associated with this ritual all at the same time.
Imagine each time you evoke the archangels, they heard your "prayer" and will carry it out.
Keep performing LBRP until one "feels" that the spell worked.
When this happens, end with LBRP as purely a banishing ritual.
Feel free to add anything you want to the imagery you want that you think will add to the effect.
Tell me how it goes.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?13564-LBRP-as-a-spell&goto=newpost
Behold! ..I am Zarbach the Splendiferous!
how do *YOU* reach this thing called "Gnosis"?
personally, -I- just get into a state of mind where i think that "all is one and i'm connected to.. like.. EVERYTHING".
it's pretty hard to explain, i don't use drugs, i don't contemplate on a sigil, i don't spin around.. i just *feel -IT-*
..What's YOUR approach?
Behold! ..I am Zarbach the Splendiferous!
how do *YOU* reach this thing called "Gnosis"?
personally, -I- just get into a state of mind where i think that "all is one and i'm connected to.. like.. EVERYTHING".
it's pretty hard to explain, i don't use drugs, i don't contemplate on a sigil, i don't spin around.. i just *feel -IT-*
..What's YOUR approach?



