CONSPIRACY 101 AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER v.3
A particular Conspiracy needs to be proved. The potential for Conspiracy does not.
INTRO
The concept of the New World Order – like a lot of subjects I’ve tried to cover through 101 – is extremely difficult terrain. I will however present a few of my thoughts on it from a few different angles because I believe the New World Order (NWO) and the presence of ‘conspiracy theory’ as a prevalent form at large shares relationships with many of the insights I have made and is tied up with secrets of the human condition.
As with other subjects I have looked at, I will try to neatly side-step the dizzying labyrinth of historical nomenclature and avoid getting tangled in who did what and said what – none of which I have any evidence for outside of general knowledge, legend or what is observable; and concentrate on where conspiracy comes from, the role it plays as conscious theme, and perhaps the role it might play as a symptomatic indication of something deeper regarding human need and geometry. I will also touch on the Magi and how there may be a conspiracy behind conspiracy that has imprisoned us for millennia. The Gnostic idea of a demiurge who created a false replica earth to imprison us may at first sound outlandish like many other occult concepts of creation – yet my work is increasingly uncovering evidence that there may be more to it than just mythology after all.
PREP
Many years ago I read the ‘Protocols of Zion’ – and for anyone who doesn’t know what that is, (It’s been uploaded to 101) it’s sometimes called the ‘Granddaddy of conspiracies’ and involves an allegedly faked global charter put together by an elite cabal of secret Jewish conspirators as a step-by-step plan to take over the world. The document details a break down of practical steps needed to achieve global domination by covert and over measures and methods including manipulating economic pressures via usury, breeding out gentiles and infiltrating gentile society by becoming doctors, lawyers, teachers and other highly positioned socialites within the infrastructure of the gentile to take power and unite against the enemy as one.
Presently there is a collective body of testimony that claims the Protocols were faked by the Nazis to get the Jews in trouble. Whether this is true I do not know – and remain undecided – but aside from the frightening lucidity of each of these plans, there is a chilling statement at the end of the document which basically says – ‘the proof of any conspiracy lies in what has happened around you – look around you and ask yourself, has what they said would happen, happen?’ At the time of writing (2010) I see evidence and live in a world where almost every section of the Protocols can easily be argued to have been implemented. Coincidence? Maybe. Conspiracy? Maybe.
If I suddenly turn to discussing the Protocols and attempt to show evidence to prove either way a conspiracy by the Nazis or the Jews; or enter at all into the finer details brought up by the Protocols – according to my approach – I immediately lose a significant amount of information this form is expressive and representative of and enter a labyrinth of aimless semantics.
The loss of information I often point out (In ‘Ethereal Discourses’ for instance) is important here. It is common practice among humans to rely on precedent – i.e. we can discuss something like the Holocaust at length because a lot of information, many views, and seven decades of propaganda from both sides for or against this topic have left a hefty mountain of records and information behind for us to build various cases.
Based on what we have read, or had told us, or imbibed form television, juggled in our heads to sort out the truth – we can go head to head in debate against certain opposing views using precedent – dates, decisive military maneuvers, psychological brainwashing, reports of force, first-hand accounts, footage, photographs, and records; weighing in our evidence to prove or disprove the opposing view. We strengthen our case using precedents, and weaken another’s case using precedents – these precedents are generally things that have been proven, accepted as fact, historically recorded, taught in school, written down, or put together by our logical deduction and are accepted as given – but the carrier of such facts itself, i.e. language, moral judgment, ethics, how we prejudice time and space, all weigh in heavily in the relationship – yet are seldom ever analyzed. They are treated as pre-existing proven methods of communication – but they are not. This is precisely why all the intelligence, well-read intellectuals, scholars, academics, and so on do not necessarily have greater awareness and lucidity no matter how eloquent or educated. Education tends to cram the brain with catalogues of forms – which are then compared against each other in logical deduction and critical analysis – but without a heuristic analysis of one’s own method of enquiry and indeed the general methods of enquiry – empathy with oneself and others remains low, trapped in prisms of words and concepts that bounce endlessly off one another without ever allowing us closer to the source of what we are and how we work.
The majority of occult teachings are human-centred self-masturbation, clichéd romanticism about how great we are, how aware we are, and how different some of us are from others far less unintelligent than ourselves; Enlightened, Initiated, Adept, set apart, or so we like to think. The major problem is the ego – it often refuses to be humble, to accept its own failings, to drop its ridiculous self-important visage and allow the stasis it holds so tightly in check – to be dropped so that it can accept an insult for its own good.
In a typical conversation regarding the conditions at Auschwitz, precedents (proof/facts) are presented to build a case for one’s argument. Following who has the most accurate information, i.e. a guard at Auschwitz may be in a better position to give a clear account of what happened because s/he was there – unless we opt to believe a surviving prisoner of war whom we suspect would be more likely to tell the truth and the guard keep things back to protect themselves, minimize damage, avoid punishment and condemnation etc.
In every case where people argue about the War (any war – or in fact, anything at all) – they use precedent (facts, dates, names, proof, first-hand knowledge and cross-reference)– because the War is long gone, many years in the past, precedent is all they have left to prove it ever existed.
They therefore compare dates, military decisions, motivation, personal ambition of leaders, tactics and pressures put on the civilians, propaganda, subtlety of persuasion, conversations allegedly had between parties, anecdotal evidence, surviving diaries of prisoners and guards, personal accounts and almost always quote someone who has says something that adds weight to their case.
Even if they were present at the War – reports and accounts by people widely vary, especially as regards sensitive issues – for all sorts of reasons, as many as you can think of – and because of this, the variables of information recorded are far too nebulous and vast to ever be sure of their authenticity.
Each human being is possessed of a unique perspective, motivation, memory, associative catalogue for instance, and as a result, people tend toward remembering different things, placing importance on certain things, and things differently [See ‘Physis of the Sinister’ for loss of information theory]. Consider also that whilst people are social creatures, communicating a great deal to each other with words – in each of us thrives a hidden world; our eyes fall on different places in the world, focus importance in different degrees, take things differently, find different things important, memorable, etc. There is ample evidence to show this is true – in the way hundreds of thousands of different authors who all attended the gulf, Vietnam, or World Wars remember them and what they remember about them. How it affected them or others. This shows how extremely important it is for such stories to be recorded – because subconsciously, they each know the unwritten rule of human history – that if it doesn’t exist in some record or another – it never happened. And it never happened – because it was never recorded.
The onus for so many things – the rock of Science – is on providing ‘proof’. But unless we experience first-hand a location or event, we only know of things – and here are a few conspiracy based examples; UFO’s, Crop Circles, Aliens, Area 51 – by precedent only.
But if enough scientific magazines pick up and support something, even if its complete theoretical nonsense that speculates on things existing so it can speculate on other things existing without any evidence for the first thing, (Stephen Hawking’s – universe in a nutshell for instance) it enters popular culture and can become accepted. Within a few years, ‘Quantum’ will have always existed for the generation born after me.
If we are with a group of people who refuse to acknowledge in speech or writing that what we saw was what they saw, the truth is silenced in favour of conspiracy. It is one thing to observe a UFO landing in a field, quite another for it to have ever happened.
I wrote in an earlier post that, in my opinion, you’d have to be blind or deaf to not realize the thousands of mini-conspiracies around us in everyday life. Music, what we listen to, is a conspiracy, for instance – people conspire to make you buy it, support it, report it. Time, its enforced, and god help you if you refuse to acknowledge it. Roads, they direct your car where to go, its not easy to go where they don’t lead. The traffic lights tell you when to go and stop. Computer games keep you occupied in your house doing destructive things in a virtual world instead of spending that time out on the street doing them for real. Every second you are entertained, you are controlled by someone whose graphic design, dialogue, symbolism, presentation, sales pitch, utilities, is making you think ‘frog juice’ is PowerAde.
And you believe it, because you are trained from birth to pick up the habits of your peers and copy them. You are equipped with the training program and the tools to discern the difference between the two, but never taught to question the training program. There are measures in place that conspire against us daily in thousands of ways from birth to death. I’ll cover some soon, but let’s ask, how effective is conspiracy against us?
Collusion or conspiring is easy – all you do to conspire is simply help someone do something. When you ask your partner how many sugars they want in their coffee, you conspire together to make that cup of coffee the way they want it. If you want Bill to invite you to golf next Saturday, you approve his house loan. If you want to drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico you sweet-talk the owners and make them rich; then you use an army of lawyers (Maybe some of them provided by a friend of Bill) to clear any legal obstacles. If there’s trouble, perhaps you can hire some heavies through Sam who you also met at golf through Max and discussed your ambitions with to build a new golfing resort on a Caribbean island hideaway. Max likes that idea, and would dearly love to tee off in such a paradisiacal vista and offers to set you up with some heavies who can take care of any greenie locals or people opposing the drill for a few thousand dollars– and all of a sudden you have a conspiracy among a large group of powerful, influential people, to drill for oil in a protected zone, built on the back of people (who may not even really know one another or how many people are colluding, or even how they are colluding outside of their own sphere of influence) simply doing a small favour for one another. Human beings are very basic – conspirators are not magicians – they all have to offer something to another human being to get something in return, they have to engage in banal small-talk no matter how rich they are, they have to develop relationships and make friends, and do favours for one another. They don’t have to get along, but it helps.
But they don’t have to know each other either. In fact – the prevalent idea that conspirators in something like the NWO all know each other and every other player in the conspiracy is a bit too fantastic to fly. Perhaps there are a few groups like that – but I think it is more likely that we tell ourselves they sit in high-backed chairs in secret rooms under undersea volcanoes and run the world whilst sipping gold – because no-one wants to think that ‘we’ could be controlled by half-wits. I’ve worked in the government. I’m sorry to say we are. You can see for yourself the antics that occur on Parliament and the resemblance to kindergarten behaviour for yourself on Australian TV. It’s typical of the ego to only accept that it’s might can be conquered by gods, unstoppable forces and superhuman intellect – i.e. aliens.
Yes, amongst the rabble there are always a few shining scheming diamonds, sharp and brilliant that are able to organize things – but since they have to rely on people not quite so brilliant and astute, things can often turn to shit with unpredictable results. The best laid plans of men and mice…
There are a couple of basic factors involved in collusion (conspiracy) – one is that the pleasure principle usually works on everybody. You can pay all but the most stubborn idealist enough money to make them forget they had an issue with you stabbing dolphins in the face. If money, independent wealth, and flattery don’t buy you – then there’s the pain principle. Refuse to roll over and not get out of the way and you can be taken to court, imprisoned, beaten up, killed, silenced, disavowed, assassinated, or kicked out of your practice, for example – that sort of intimidation works on most people too. If the systems in place can’t do either to get you to come over to their way of thinking, or shut you up – then maybe they’ll just envelop you, give you your five minutes of fame, or the lethal six minutes; make you a star, get you on talk shows, start selling t-shirts, hats, stickers with your name on it and make a mockery of your cause by making it into yet another saleable commodity to be packaged and sold, until people get sick of the saturation and sick of you. It depends what the situation calls for.
There are some other factors in collusion – if people like you, they believe you. If they don’t like you, they are suspicious of you. America chooses its president, clearly not on each candidates merits and who will run the country most soundly, but who they like better. Who can win them over, turn their frog juice into PowerAde the most competently and completely with fanfare and election stunts. Escapism it seems, is also a powerful motivator of people. Alright, now that you’ve been primed for conspiracy talk and terms, have now started thinking about conspiracies, and are hopefully intrigued enough to want to know what else I have to say. Let’s begin.
From http://www.occultcorpus.com/forum/showthread.php?12930-Conspiracy-101-Intro-Prep&goto=newpost
